Vol 1 No 1 (2016): "Generating Knowledge through Research", 25-27 October 2016, CAS Auditorium - Universiti Utara Malaysia
Articles

TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS TOWARDS THE USE OF STUDENT-CENTRED LEARNING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSES
SIKAP DAN KEPERCAYAAN GURU TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN PEMBELAJARAN BERPUSAT SISWA DALAM KELAS BAHASA INGGRIS


Suriati Salleh
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Nurahimah Mohd. Yusoff
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published October 30, 2016
Keywords
  • Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs,
  • Student-centred learning,
  • English language
How to Cite
Salleh, S., & Mohd. Yusoff, N. (2016). TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS TOWARDS THE USE OF STUDENT-CENTRED LEARNING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSES. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 1(1), picecrs.v1i1.501. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.501

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine teachers’ attitudes and beliefs towards the use of Student-Centred Learning in English language classes. In addition, it also sought to examine the extent of student-centred learning practices amongst primary school teachers have on their students’ performance in the English language. A survey was carried out to collect data from 147 primary school English language teachers in Perlis. The questionnaires were used to determine the teachers’ beliefsand attitudes towards student-centred learning and to measure the extent teachers practice or attempt to practice student-centred learning in their classrooms. The results for March Test and mid-term examinations were also collected from 346 respondents of Year Five students to determine the relationship between student-centred learning practices and the students’ achievement. The findings of this research showed that there were positive attitudes of the English language teachers towards student-centred learning. However, the teachers employ both student-centred and teacher-centred learning strategies in teaching English language for the primary school. Apart from that, the findings also revealed that there was a positive relationship between student-centred learning practices and students’ achievement in the English language subject but the relationship was a weak relationship.As such, recommendations were proposed in terms of improving teacher training and future research to investigate further on student-centred learning practices in Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alexandra, C. J. (2013). Towards a learner-centred approach to teaching English. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, 6 (1-2), 205-210.
  2. Attard, A. Di Ioio, E. Geven, & K, Santa, R. (2010). Student centered learning: An insight into theory and practice. Bucharest: Esu.
  3. Bryer, T. A., & Seigler, D. (2009). Theoretical and instrumental rationales of student empowerment through social and web-based technologies. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 18(3), 429–448.
  4. Ebert-May, D., Derting, T.L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J.L., Long, T.M., & Jardeleza, S.E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of Faculty Professional Development Programs. BioScience, 61(7), 550-558.
  5. Echevarria, J. & Vogt, M. (2010). Response to intervention (RTI) and English learners: Making it happen. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  6. Ernest Lim Kok Seng. (2014). Investigating teachers’ views of student-centred learning approach. International Education Studies, 7, 143-148. doi:10.5539/ies.v7n7p143 p. 143-148.
  7. Froyd, F., & Simpson, N. (2010). Student-centered learning addressing faculty questions about student centered learning. Retrieved from
  8. http://ccliconference.org/files/2010/03/Froyd_Stu-CenteredLearning.pdf
  9. Jan Hardman, & Norhaslynda A-Rahman. (2014). Teachers and the implementation of a new English curriculum in Malaysia, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(3), 260-277, doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.980826.
  10. Juliana Othman. (2010). Teachers’ instructional practices in teaching English at Malaysian primary schools. Proceedings of EDULEARN10 Conference, 483-491.
  11. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran Bahasa Inggeris Tahun 5. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
  12. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1991). Language-learning tasks: Teacher intention and learner interpretation. ELT Journal, 45(2), 98-107.
  13. Lea, S. J., D. Stephenson, and J. Troy. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student centred learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education 28(3), 321–334.
  14. Mei-Hui Lin, Tsai-Fu Chuang, & Han-Pin Hsu. (2014). The relationship among teaching beliefs, student-centred teaching concept and the instructional innovation. Journal of Service Science and Management, 7, 201-210.
  15. Melor Md Yunus, & Nur Dalila Mohd Arshad. (2015). ESL teachers’ perceptions toward the practices and prospects of autonomous language learning. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 41-51. doi:10.5539/ass.v11n2p41
  16. Ministry of Education. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025.
  17. Nima Farzaneh. (2014). Students’ attitude towards using cooperative learning for teaching reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 287-292.
  18. Nonkukhetkhong, R. B., Baldauf Jr, & Moni, K. (2006). Thai TESOL International Conference: Learner Centeredness in Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  19. Nor Hashimah Jalaludin, Norsimah Mat Awal, & Kesumawati Abu Bakar. (2008). The mastery of English language among lower secondary school students in Malaysia: A linguistic analysis. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (2), 106-119.
  20. Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279 – 295.
  21. Phan Le Haa, Joyce Kho, & Brendan Chng. (2013). Nation building, English as an international language, medium of instruction, and language debate: Malaysia and possible ways forward. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(2), 58-71.
  22. Prapaisit de Segovia, & Hardison, D. M., (2008). Implementing education reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives. ELT Journal, 63(2), 154-162.
  23. Rosniah Mustaffa, Idris Aman, Nor Diyana Saupi, & Noorizah Mohd Noor. (2014). Interdiscursivity of pedagogic discourse in the ESL classroom in primary school. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(1), 63-84.
  24. Satterfield, J. (2015). Understanding the differences between the amount of learning in a teacher vs student-centered pedagogy. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/understanding-differences-between-amount-learning-vs-josh-satterfield
  25. Seid Mohamad. (2016). English language teachers’ attitudes towards cooperative learning. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 123-136.
  26. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research method for business: A skill building approach.(4th. edition). United States: John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Shihiba, S. E. S. (2011). An investigation of Libyan EFL teachers’ conceptions of the communicative learner-centred approach in relation to their implementation of an English language curriculum innovation in secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Durham, Durham, UK.
  28. Siti Rosminah Md Derus, & Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali. (2014). Integration of visualisation techniques and active learning strategy in learning computer programming: A proposed framework. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(1), 93-103.
  29. Thang, S.M., & Azarina Alias (2007). Investigating readiness for autonomy: A comparison of Malaysian ESL undergraduates of three public universities. Reflections on English Language Teaching Journal, 6(1), 1-18.
  30. Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Washington: John Wiley & Sons.