Vol 1 No 1 (2016): "Generating Knowledge through Research", 25-27 October 2016, CAS Auditorium - Universiti Utara Malaysia
Articles

ISSUES CONTRIBUTING TO LOW PERFORMANCE OF ENGLISH IN A NATIONAL SCHOOL IN SONG, SARAWAK
PERMASALAHAN YANG BERKONTRIBUSI TERHADAP KINERJA BAHASA INGGRIS RENDAH DI SEKOLAH NASIONAL DI SONG, SARAWAK


Louis Cheng
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Melor Md. Yunus
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Maslawati Mohamad
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published October 30, 2016
Keywords
  • low performance,
  • rural,
  • primary school
How to Cite
Cheng, L., Md. Yunus, M., & Mohamad, M. (2016). ISSUES CONTRIBUTING TO LOW PERFORMANCE OF ENGLISH IN A NATIONAL SCHOOL IN SONG, SARAWAK. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 1(1), picecrs.v1i1.519. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.519

Abstract

English is becoming more important in this globalized world. In Malaysia, calls have been made from rulers and commoners alike to use English as the primary medium of instruction in primary schools. Although Malaysia has centralized education system for every state, rural schools might be in danger of losing out to their counterparts in the urban areas. Numerous programmes have been done to bring the standard of English in the school up to par with their counterparts from urban schools and yet English remains a tricky subject to master. In a rural school in the district of Song, Sarawak, English has always been the lowest performing subjects in UPSR year after year. Parallel to UPSR, the pupils for English intervention programme (LINUS BI) has the most compared to Bahasa Malaysia (BM) and Mathematics. This paper will attempt to research and understand the primary issues contributing to low performance of English in the school. At the same time, this paper will attempt to compare the background of pupils with high performance of English and pupils with low and mediocre performance in English and the causes leading to what they are today.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of labor Economics, 25(1), 95-135.
  2. Ahmed, S. (2015). Attitudes towards English Language Learning among EFL Learners at UMSKAL. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 6-16.
  3. Barley, Z. A., & Beesley, A. D. (2007). Rural school success: What can we learn. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(1), 1-16.
  4. COLEMAN, J., CAMPBELL, E., HOBSON, C., MCPARTLAND, J., MOOD, A.,
  5. WEINFELD, F., & YORK, R. (2010). Equality of educational opportunity. The Structure of Schooling: Readings in the Sociology of Education, 120.
  6. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of family psychology, 19(2), 294.
  7. Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The modern language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
  8. Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning.Language teaching, 31(03), 117-135.
  9. Etsey, K. (2005). Causes of low academic performance of primary school pupils in the Shama Sub-Metro of Shama Ahanta East Metropolitan Assembly (SAEMA) in Ghana. In Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Education in West Africa.
  10. Gardner, R. C. (2007). Motivation and second language acquisition.
  11. Hanapiah, M. (2004). English language and the language of development: A Malaysian perspective. Jurnal kemanusiaan, (3), 107-120.
  12. Hanushek, E. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 280-288.
  13. Ho, C. C. (2010). Review of teaching and learning of science and mathematics in schools. Academy of Sciences, Malaysia.
  14. Jackson, M. E. (2010). Where are the parents: The parent's perspective of parental involvement in education (Doctoral dissertation, The George
  15. Washington University).Keblawi, F. (2009). A review of language learning motivation theories. Jameea,12, 23-57.
  16. Kohn, A. (2001). One-size-fits-all education doesn’t work. Boston Globe.
  17. Lai, J., & Yien, L. P. REVEALING THE REALITY OF PPSMI.
  18. Lamb, M. (2004). Integrative motivation in a globalizing world. System, 32(1), 3-19.
  19. Lamb, M (2013) 'Your mum and dad can't teach you!': Constraints on agency among rural learners of English in Indonesia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34 (1). 14 - 29 (15). ISSN 0143-4632
  20. Marks, G., McMillan, J., & Hillman, K. (2001). Tertiary entrance performance: The role of student background and school factors. LSAY Research Reports, 24.
  21. Mustafa, D. (2009). ESL or EFL? TESL or TEFL?.
  22. Monk, D. H. (2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas.The Future of Children, 17(1), 155-174.
  23. Namupala, S. (2013). Factors that contribute to poor perfomance among grade 10 learners in Onamutai circuit, Oshana region in Namibia (Doctoral dissertation).
  24. Rahman, A. (2012). A Conceptual Framework In Examining The Contributing Factors To Low Academic Achievement: self-efficacy, cognitive Ability, support System And Socio-economic.
  25. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252.
  26. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning1. Applied linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
  27. Selamat, A., Esa, A., & Saad, S. S. (2011). Teaching and learning mathematics and science in english in primary schools in the state of Johor, Malaysia. Journal of Education.
  28. Shell, T. E. (2010). Impact of Student Behavior on a School Culture from the Teacher's Perspective. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
  29. Souriyavongsa, T., Rany, S., Abidin, M. J. Z., & Mei, L. L. (2013). Factors causes students low English language learning: A case study in the National University of Laos. English in Education, (1), 179-192.
  30. Takase, A. (2007). Japanese High School Students' Motivation for Extensive L2 Reading. Reading in a foreign language, 19(1), 1-18.
  31. Tan, P. K. (2005). The medium-of-instruction debate in Malaysia: English as a Malaysian language?. Language problems & language planning, 29(1), 47-66.
  32. Thirusanku, J., & Yunus, M. M. (2014). Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 10(14), p254.
  33. Ting, S. H. (2003). Impact of language planning on language attitudes: A case study in Sarawak. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development, 24(3), 195-210.
  34. Wang, J. (2011). Culture differences and English teaching. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 223.
  35. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational research, 73(1), 89-122.
  36. Willingham, D. T. (2012). Ask the Cognitive Scientist: Why Does Family Wealth Affect Learning?. American Educator, 36(1), 33-39.
  37. Yamat, H., Fisher, R., & Rich, S. (2014). Revisiting English language learning among Malaysian children. Asian Social Science, 10(3), p174.
  38. Yunus, F. W., Malik, M., & Zakaria, A. (2013). Identity Status of TESL Students in Malaysia.
  39. Yunus, M. M., & Abdullah, N. R. K. R. B. (2011). Motivation and attitudes for learning English among year six students in primary rural school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2631-2636.
  40. Yunus, M. M., Osman, W. S. W., & Ishak, N. M. (2011). Teacher-student relationship factor affecting motivation and academic achievement in ESL classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2637-2641.
  41. Zhou, M., Ma, W. J., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children's motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 492-498.