Vol 1 No 1 (2016): "Generating Knowledge through Research", 25-27 October 2016, CAS Auditorium - Universiti Utara Malaysia
Articles

GAYA KEPIMPINAN PENGETUA DAN KEPUASAN KERJA GURU DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEBANGSAAN DAERAH MARANG, TERENGGANU
THE CHAIRMAN'S LEADERSHIP STYLE AND TEACHER JOB SATISFACTION AT THE NATIONAL SECOND SCHOOL OF THE REGION OF MARANG, TERENGGANU


Ahmad Yusri Ismail
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published October 30, 2016
Keywords
  • Gaya Kepimpinan,
  • Pengetua,
  • Kepuasan Kerja Guru
How to Cite
Ismail, A. Y. (2016). GAYA KEPIMPINAN PENGETUA DAN KEPUASAN KERJA GURU DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEBANGSAAN DAERAH MARANG, TERENGGANU. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 1(1), picecrs.v1i1.577. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.577

Abstract

Kajian dijalankan untuk mencari perkaitan di antara gaya kepimpinan yang diamalkan oleh pengetua dengan tahap kepuasan kerja guru di sekolah menengah di daerah Marang, Terengganu. Ini adalah kerana kepuasan kerja guru dalam menjalankan tugas sering dikaitkan dengan gaya kepimpinan seseorang pengetua. Selain itu, kajian ini juga bertujuan menentukan perbezaan tahap kepuasan kerja guru-guru berdasarkan jenis gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Ciri-ciri demografi yang membezakan tahap kepuasan kerja guru juga dikaji oleh pengkaji.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Avolio, B.J, & Bass, B.M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sample, Ed.3. Redwood City, Ca: Mind Garden, Inc.
  2. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.
  3. Bass, B.M & Avolio, B.J (1992). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (Form 5X-Rater, revised. Binghampton, New York: Centre for leadership studies, States University of New York at Binghampton.
  4. Bass B.M.& Avolio, B.J. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 188-218.
  5. Hassan, A.A. Argia & Aziah Ismail. (2013). The influence of transformational leadership on the level of TQM implementation in the higher education sector. Higher Education Studies, 3 (1), 136 – 146.
  6. Khalid Ashari (1997). Hubungan gaya kepimpinan dan gaya kepemimpinan transformasi pengetua dengan kepuasan dan motivasi. Usul kajian Master Pendidikan Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan.
  7. Mohd Yusri Ibrahim. (2014). Model kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dan kompetensi pengajaran guru. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 11-25.
  8. Mohd Yusri Ibrahim, Che Hasniza Che Noh, & Siti Zaimah Ibrahim. (2013). Model of e-leadership, intra-team communication and job satisfaction among school leaders in malaysia. Dalam International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology, 2, 94-109.
  9. Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani (2013). The practices of Professional Learning Communities: A Development Country of Excellent School Leader’s Perspectives. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 1(3), 10-27.
  10. Poon, J.M.L. (1995). Effect of perceived transformational leadership behavior of followers satisfaction and motivation: Survey results of Malaysian managers. Journal of Malaysian Management Review, Jun 1995, Halaman 42-49.
  11. Raziah bte Mansor & Ahmad bin Esa (2009). Hubungan gaya kepimpinan guru besar dengan kepuasan kerja guru di tiga buah sekolah rendah di Seremban. Seminar Kebangsaan Pengurusan Pendidikan PKPGB 2009.
  12. Sapora Sipon, Justina Esther Gubud (2010). Gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan kepuasan kerja guru. Prosiding Seminar Profesion Perguruan,USIM. Di Capai pada Julai 29, 2012 daripada http://ddms.usim.edu.my /handle/123456789/2689.
  13. Yang, Y. (2012). Xiaozhang zai xuexiao gaijin zhong de lingdaoli (Principals’transformationleadership in school improvement).Jiaoyu lilun yu shijian (Theory and Practice ofEducation), 32(1), 16-18.