HUBUNGAN KEADILAN PENILAIAN PRESTASI DENGANKOMITMEN ORGANISASI GURU
RELATIONSHIP OF ACHIEVEMENT ASSESSMENT JUSTICE WITH TEACHER ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT
-
(1) * Tang Swee Mei
Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(2) Lim Kong Teong Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(3) Abdull Sukor Shaari Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(4) Ab. Aziz Yusof Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Kajian ini bertujuan meninjau hubungan keadilan penilaian prestasi dengan komitmen organisasi guru sekolah. Sebanyak 86 buah sekolah menengah kebangsaan di negeri Kedah dan Perlis terlibat dalam kajian ini. Keputusan kajian mendapati kedua-dua aspek keadilan penilaian prestasi serta komitmen organisasi dalam kalangan guru adalah tidak begitu memberangsangkan. Keputusan kajian juga menunjukkan kedua-dua dimensi keadilan penilaian prestasi mempunyai hubungan positif yang signifikan dengan komitmen organisasi guru.
Downloads
References
Abdul Razak Kamaruddin, Sulaiman Md. Yassin, Ahmad Munir Mohd Salleh, & Wan Abd Aziz Wan Mohd Amin (2008). Pengaruh keadilan penilaian prestasi dan etika organisasi ke atas komitmen organisasi. International Journal of Management Studies, 15(Bumper Issue), 115-130. Malaysia: Universiti Utara Malaysia.
AbdullSukorShaari, Ab. Aziz Yusof, Mohd Khan Jamal Khan, Tang, S. M., & Lim, K. T. (2008). Keadilanpenilaianprestasidalamkalangan guru danhubungannyadenganmotivasikerjadanprestasiakademiksekolah. International Journal of Management Studies, 15 (Bumper Issue), 159-176.
Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management—And why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54(6), 503-507.
Arsaythamby Veloo, & Wirda Hasmin Zolkepli (2011). Atribut sistem penilaian prestasi dengan kepuasan kerja dalam kalangan guru. International Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 197-216.
Benardin, H. J. (2003). Human resource management: An experiential approach (3rdEds). Bostan. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Berman, E.M., Bowman, J.S., West, J.P., & Van Mart, M. (2006). Human Resource Management in Public Service: Paradoxes, Processes, and Problems (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Choi, S. L., Tan, O. K.,WanKhairuzzaman Wan Ismail and SitiZaleha Abdul
Rasid. (2013). A review on performance appraisal system: An ineffective and destructive practice? Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14 (7), 887-891.
Choon, L. K., & Embi, M. A. (2012). Subjectivity, organizational justice and performance appraisal: Understanding the concept of subjectivity in leading towards employees’ perception of fairness in the performance appraisal. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 189-193.
Deluga, R. J. (1999). The quest for justice on the job: Essays and Experiments. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72 (1), 122-124.
Embi, M. A. (2010). Cabaran penerapan sistem penggajian berasaskan merit di sektor publik: Analisis sistem saraan baru (SSB) di Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Budaya Dan Ekonomi, 6(2), 79-99.
Fauziah Noordin, Rahmah Mohd Rashid, Rohani Ghani, Rasimah Aripin, &
Zabani Darus. (2010). Teacher professionalisation and organizational commitment: Evidence from Malaysia. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(2), 49-57.
Fejgin, N. Ephraty, N, &KBen-sira, D. (1995). Workenvironment and burnout of physicaleducationteachers. Journal of Teaching Physical Education. 15. 64-78.
Firestone, W.A., &Pennel, J.R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 489-525.
Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice: combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.35, 108–119.
Folger, R., &Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130.
Gabris, G.T. &Ihrke, D. M. (2000). Improving employee acceptance toward performance appraisal and merit pay systems: The role of leadership credibility. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(1),
-53.
Gabris, G.T. &Ihrke, D. M. (2001). Does performance appraisal contribute to heightened levels of employee burnout? Public Personnel Management, 30(2), 157-173.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (2), 340-342.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Research in Organizational Behavior,12, 111-157.
Griffin, G. (1986) Issues in student teaching: A review. In J. Raths& L. Katz (eds), Advances in teacher education (vol.2). Norwood: Ablex.
Harrington, J.R., & Lee, J.H. (2015). What drives perceived fairness of performance appraisal? Exploring the effects of psychological contract fulfillment on emplyees’ perceived fairness of performance appraisal in US Federal Agencies. Public Personnel Management, 44 (2), 214-238.
Johnson, J. S. (2003). Employees’ justice perceptions of performance appraisal systems: Attitudinal, behavioral, and performance consequences. Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Systems Science: Psychology, Oregon: Portland State University.
Kondrasuk, J. N. (2011). So what would an ideal performance appraisal look like? Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 12(1), 57-71.
Korsgaard, & Roberson (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: the role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management.21, 657–670.
Lau, C. M., & Martin-Sardesai, A. V. (2012). The role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system. The British Accounting Review, 44(3), 157-172.
Lind, E., &Lissak, R. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19-29.
Martin, C. (1996). The Role of Justice Judgments in Explaining the Relationship Between Job satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. Group & Organizational Management, 21 (1), 84-99.
Nunnally, J.(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Roberts, J.A., Coulson, K.R., &Conko, L.B. (1999). Salespersons persption equity and justice and their impact on organizational commitment and intent to turnover. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practices, 7(1), 1-16.
Rosenholtz, S.J.(1989). Teachers’ Workplace: The Social Organization of School, New York: Longman.
Selvarajan, T. T., & Cloninger, P. A. (2011). Can performance appraisal motivate employees to improve performance? A Mexican study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
Sprenger, J. (2011). Stress and coping behaviors among primary school teachers.Unpublished dissertation of Master of Arts, Greenville, North Carolina: East Carolina University.
Suhaimi Sudin (2011). Fairness of and satisfaction with performance appraisal process. Journal of Global Management, 2(1), 66-83.
Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Law and Society Review, 22, p. 301-335.
Copyright (c) 2016 Tang Swee Mei, Lim Kong Teong, Abdull Sukor Shaari, Ab. Aziz Yusof
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
