Proceedings of The ICECRS
Vol 1 No 1 (2016): "Generating Knowledge through Research", 25-27 October 2016, CAS Auditorium - Universiti Utara Malaysia
Articles

HUBUNGAN KEPIMPINAN SEKOLAH DENGAN TINGKAH LAKU GURU GENERASI ‘Y’
THE RELATIONSHIP OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP WITH THE BEHAVIOR OF TEACHERS GENERATION 'Y'


View Article
  • Jamilah Man,
  • Yahya Don,
  • Siti Noor Ismail
Jamilah Man
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Yahya Don
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Siti Noor Ismail
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.592
Published October 30, 2016
Keywords
  • Kepimpinan sekolah,
  • tingkah laku guru,
  • generasi ‘Y’
How to Cite
Man, J., Don, Y., & Ismail, S. N. (2016). HUBUNGAN KEPIMPINAN SEKOLAH DENGAN TINGKAH LAKU GURU GENERASI ‘Y’. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 1(1), picecrs.v1i1.592. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.592

Copyright (c) 2016 Jamilah Man, Yahya Don, Siti Noor Ismail

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Funding data

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Amalan kepimpinan yang dipraktikkan oleh pemimpin sekolah merupakan tunggak utama dalam memastikan sistem pendidikan berada pada tahap yang membanggakan selaras  dengan hasrat kerajaan seperti yang termaktub dalam Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.Kajian ini dijalankan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan antara kepimpinan sekolah dengan tingkah laku guru dalam kalangan guru generasi ‘Y’ di Maktab Rendah Sains MARA, Zon Utara, Semenanjung Malaysia. Kajian ini menjalankan kaedah tinjaun rentasan menggunakan soal selidik terpiawai. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengukur kepimpinan pengetua adalah Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ)  yang dibina oleh Bass dan Avolio pada tahun 1995, manakala tingkah laku guru pula diukur dengan menggunakan Teacher Behaviors Inventory (TBI) yang dibina oleh Murray (1983). Dapatan kajian membuktikan wujudnya hubungan positif yang signifikan antara kepimpinan sekolah dengan tingkah laku guru generasi ‘Y’. Justeru, adalah  disarankan agar barisan kepimpinan sekolah mengamalkan  setiap dimensi kepimpinan sekolah dalam kepimpinan mereka supaya kepimpinan sekolah semakin berkesan dan cemerlang selari dengan kandungan Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abdul Ghani Abdullah. (2005). Kepimpinan Transformasi Pengetua dan Penggantian Kepimpinan sebagai Penentu Komitmen terhadap Organisasi dan Perlakuan Warga Organisasi Pendidikan. , 20: 53-68.
  2. Afsar. B, Badir. Y. F, Saeed. B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems. Vol. 114 Iss 8 pp. 1270 - 1300
  3. Avolio, B. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Keller.
  4. Balthazard, P., Waldman, D., Howell, J. & Atwater, A. (2002). Modeling performance in teams: The effect of media type, shared leadership, interaction style and cohesion.
  5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press : New York.
  6. Bass, B. & Yammarino, F. J. ( 1991). Congruence of self and others‟ leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40, 437-54.
  7. Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B.J., Jung, D. I. & Berson, V. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207-218.
  9. Behrstock, E., & Clifford, M. (2009). Leading Gen Y Teachers: Emerging Strategies for School Leaders. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
  10. Boyne, G. A. (2003). What is public service improvement? Public Administration, 51 (2), 211-227.
  11. Broadbent, M. & Kitzis, E. S. (2005). The new CEO leaders: setting the agenda and delivering results. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
  12. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
  13. Colbert E. A. (2008). CEO transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams. Acaademy of Management Journal, 51 (1), 81-96.
  14. Crampton, S. M. &Hodge, J. W. (2009). Generation Y:Unchartered Territory . Journal of Business & Economics Research .Volume 7, Number 41
  15. Denhardt, J. V. & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: serving not steering. New York: Sharpe.
  16. Dessler, D. (1994). How to Sort Causes in the Study of Environmental Change and Violent Conflict in Environment, Poverty, Conflict oleh Nina Gr.Leger & Dan Smith. International Peace Research Institutc, Oslo No.4: 91-112
  17. Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E. & Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 17 Iss 2 pp. 177 – 193
  18. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformationalleadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment.Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744
  19. Elenkov, D. S. (2002). Effects of leadership on organisational performance in Russian companies. Journal of Business Research, 55, 467-480.
  20. Eyal, O. and Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 256-275.
  21. Fullan M., (2011). Choosing the Wrong Drivers for Whole System Reform. Seminar series204. Centre for Strategic Education.
  22. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (2003), “Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 228-256.
  23. Hancott, D. E. (2005). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational performance in large public listed companies in Canada. Unpublished PhD thesis, Capella University.
  24. Harris, A. (2005). Distributed leadership. In B Davies (ed). The essentials of schoolleadership. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  25. Hobart, B. (2014). Understanding generation Y. PrincetonOne, Skillman: New Jersey.
  26. Jabnoun. N. & Rasasi, A. J. (2005). Transformational leadership and service quality in UAE hospitals. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 15 Iss 1 pp. 70 – 81
  27. John D. Politis. (2002). Transformational and transactional leadership enabling (disabling) knowledge acquisition of self-managed teams: the consequences for performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 23 Iss 4 pp. 186 – 197
  28. Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J. & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Effects of leadership style, anonymity and rewards in an electronic meeting system environment. Kertas kerja, Center for leadership studies, Binghamton University.
  29. Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist, 63, 96-110.
  30. Kantrowitz, B., & Wingert, P. (2000). Teachers wanted. Newsweek, 136(14), 36-42.
  31. Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational Leadership and The Performance of Research and Development Project Groups. Journal of Management , 18(3): 489-501.
  32. Kersten, D. (2002). Today’s generations face new communication gaps. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://www.usatoday.com/money/jobcenter/ workplace/communications/2002
  33. Khasawneh, S., Omari, A. and Abu-Tineh, A.M. (2012), “The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment: the case for vocational teachers in Jordan”, Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 1-15.
  34. Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (1999), “The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 679-706.
  35. Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (2006), “Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 201-227.
  36. Mariani Md noor. 2002. Kepimpinan Psikologi dalam organisasi Sekolah: Kesediaan Psikologi alam Kepimpinan di Sekolah. dalam Inovasi Dasar Pendidikan: Perspektif Sistem dan rganisasi, disunting oleh Sufean Hussin. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit universiti Malaya.
  37. Meier, J., Stephen, F. & Crocker, M. (2010). Generation Y in the workforce: Managerial challenges. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning. Vol. 6, Num. 1
  38. Menon M. E. (2013). The relationship between transformational leadership, perceived leader effectiveness and teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 52 Iss 4 ms. 509 – 528
  39. Mohd Shafie Apdal (2013); Perutusan Sambutan Hari Pendidik 2013. Majlis Amanah Rakyat MARA, Kuala Lumpur.
  40. Muhyiddin Yassin (2013). Ucapan Penggulungan: Perhimpunan Agung UMNO 2013. Dewan Merdeka, Pusat Dagangan Dunia Putra (PWTC).
  41. Murray, H. G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 138-149.
  42. Najib Abdul Razak. (2010). “Ucapan Bajet Tahun 2011”. Tersedia [online] dalam ttp://www.treasury.gov.my/pdf/bajet/ub11.pdf [dilayari di Langkawi, Malaysia: 10hb April 2014].
  43. Nunally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
  44. Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers' practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 323-346.
  45. Politis, J. D. (2002). Transformational and transactional leadership enabling (disabling) knowledge acquisition of selfmanaged teams: the consequences for performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 23 Iss 4 pp. 186 – 197
  46. PrincewaterhouseCoopers (2009). Malaysia’s gen Y unplugged. Malaysia.
  47. Raines, C. (2003). Connecting generations.Crisp Learning.
  48. Sarwat, N., Hayat, K., Qureshi, J. A. & Ali, M. (2011). Impact of strategic leadership on organizational performance, in the context of job satisfaction and organizational commitment, evidence form educational institutions of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business. Vol 3, No 4
  49. Sekaran U (2005). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (4th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  50. Smola, K. W. & Sutton, C. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23,363–382.
  51. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 971-995.
  52. Taylor T. Z., Psotka J., Legree P., (2015),"Relationships among applications of tacit knowledge and transformational/transactional leader styles", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 36 Iss 2 pp. 120 - 136
  53. Tepper, B. J. & Percy, P. M. (1994). Structural validity of the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54 (3), 734-744.
  54. Teresa Z. Taylor Joseph Psotka Peter Legre., (2015). Relationships among applications of tacit knowledge and transformational/transactional leader styles. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 36 Iss 2 pp. 120 – 136
  55. Thoonen, E.E.J., Sleegers, P.J.C., Oort, J.J., Peetsma, T.T.D. and Geijsel, F.P. (2011), “How to improve teaching practices: the role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 496-536.
  56. Wesch, M. (2008). A Vision of Students Today (& What Teachers Must Do) Britannica Blog;. Retrieved December 31, 2008.
  57. Yammarino, F. J. & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and performance. Management Review, 73 (6), 44-49.
  58. Yu. H, Leithwood. K, & Jantzi. D, (2002). The effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ commitment to change in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 40 Iss 4 pp. 368 – 389