Vol 1 No 1 (2016): "Generating Knowledge through Research", 25-27 October 2016, CAS Auditorium - Universiti Utara Malaysia
Articles

ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERSONAL FACTORS AS PREDICTORS OF MARITAL ADJUSTMENT- AN INVESTIGATION IN PAKISTANI CONTEXT
FAKTOR LINGKUNGAN DAN PRIBADI SEBAGAI PREDIKTOR PENYESUAIAN PERNIKAHAN- SEBUAH INVESTIGASI DALAM KONTEKS PAKISTANI


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published October 30, 2016
Keywords
  • Experience with in- laws,
  • husband's supportive attitude,
  • marital adjustment,
  • married women
How to Cite
Lashari, S. (2016). ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERSONAL FACTORS AS PREDICTORS OF MARITAL ADJUSTMENT- AN INVESTIGATION IN PAKISTANI CONTEXT. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 1(1), picecrs.v1i1.642. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.642

Abstract

Every individual wants to be gratified in his/her relations including marriage. Marriage is an important part of one's life as it effects social as well as emotional functioning of an individual. The present study aims to measure to investigate the roles of In-laws (experience with in- laws, husband’s supportive attitude and marital adjustment) in married life using correlation design. The questionnaires were given to 100 married women using snowball technique. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 16. The obtained results indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between the studied variables. Moreover, the study revealed a notable information about the role of relationship between the experience with in-laws and husband’s supportive attitude as a significant factor for successful marital adjustment and in developing a healthy relationship with in-laws. The study has implication for marriage counselors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adler, R., Vasiliadis, A., & Bickell, N. (2010). The relationship between continuity and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Family practice, cmp099.
  2. Anderson, R. T. (2013). Marriage: What It Is, Why It Matters, and the Consequences of Redefining It.Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, retrieved from
  3. http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/03/marriage-what-it-is-why-it-matters-and-the-consequences-of-redefining-it.
  4. Ansari, K. (2003). Personality Traits and Socioeconomic Status as Predictors of Marital Adjustment in Working Women (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Karachi).
  5. Barry, R. A., Bunde, M., Brock, R. L., & Lawrence, E. (2009). Validity and utility of a multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 48.
  6. Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992).Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors.Communication Research, 19:154–174.
  7. Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D. W., & Gardner, K. A. (2005).The relationship enhancement mode of social support. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress (pp. 3– 23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  8. Datta, P., Poortinga, Y. H., & Marcoen, A. (2003).Parent care by Indian and Belgian caregivers in their roles of daughter/daughter-in-law. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 736-749.
  9. Fatima, M., & Ajmal, M. A. (2012). Happy Marriage: A Qualitative study. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 37-42.
  10. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. London – Thousand Oaks –New Delhi: Sage publications.
  11. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn-Bacon.
  12. Girgis, S., George, R., & Anderson, R. T. (2010). What is Marriage?. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34(1), 245-287.
  13. Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2006).Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.
  14. Guerrero, Andersen, and Afifi. (2007). Close Encounters: Communication in Relationships, 2nd edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
  15. Halford, W. K (2011). Marriage and Relational Education: What Works and How to Provide It. New York: Guildford Press.
  16. Hassan, F (2014) Relationship between styles of humor and Marital Satisfaction (Unpublished Masters Thesis). Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore.
  17. Hendry, J. (2010). Marriage in Changing Japan: Community & Society. Routledge
  18. Jones, B. J. (2007). The relevance of social presence on cognitive and affective learning in an asynchronous distance learning environment as identified by selected students in a community college in Texas. Texas A&M University Ph. D. Thesis.
  19. Khalatbari, J., Ghorbanshiroudi, S., Azari, K. N., Bazleh, N., & Safaryazdi, N. (2013). The Relationship between Marital Satisfaction (Based on Religious Criteria) and Emotional Stability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 869-873.
  20. Lashari, S.A and Amjad, N. (2014). Psychological Tests (developed), Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore.
  21. Martin, R.A. (2010). The psychology of humor: as integrative approach. USA: Elsevier.
  22. Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140
  23. Trochim, W. M. (2006). Qualitative measures. Research Measures Knowledge Base: 361-9433.
  24. Volling, B. L. (2012). Family transitions following the birth of a sibling: An empirical review of changes in the firstborn's adjustment. Psychological bulletin, 138(3), 497.
  25. Wallerstein, J. S., & Kelly, J. B. (2008). Surviving the breakup: How children and parents cope with divorce. Basic Books.
  26. Wang, K. T., Slaney, R. B., & Rice, K. G. (2007). Perfectionism in Chinese university students from Taiwan: A study of psychological well-being and achievement moti¬vation. Personality and Individual Difference, 42, 1279-1290.
  27. Yeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 215-228.