PROFICIENCY LEVEL AND LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AMONG JORDANIAN STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA
TINGKAT KECAKAPAN DAN STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA DI ANTARA MAHASISWA JORDANIA UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA
-
(1) * Eshraq Mahmoud Mustafa Jaradat
Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(2) Haryati Bakrin Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between proficiency level and language learning strategies (LLSs) among Jordanian students enrolled at Universiti Utara Malaysia. The frequency level of the LLSs employed by the students was also investigated. The theoretical foundation for the study was provided by three comprehensive theories which are the Behaviorism, the Cognitive Psychology, and the Schema Theory. The data for the LLSs was obtained from using Oxford’s (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) that classifies six different strategies: 1) Memory Strategy (MS), (2) Cognitive Strategy (COG), (3) Compensation Strategy (COMPS), (4) Metacognitive Strategies (MET), (5) Affective Strategy (AFCS) and (6) Social Strategies (SOC). The frequency of the students’ overall use of LLSs was determined on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from high frequency use (3.5-5.0), medium frequency use (2.5-3.49), to low frequency use (1.0-2.49). Questionnaires were distributed and collected from a total of 97 students. Meanwhile, the students’ level of language proficiency was determined by their scores in the UUM English Language Proficiency Test (ELPT). Upon using the multiple regression analysis, the results show that the students used language learning strategies at a high frequency level. In addition, this study shows that there is a positive relationship between language learning strategy and proficiency level. These results indicate that proficiency level plays a vital role in determining the kinds of language learning strategy used. Curriculum designers and related bodies in Jordan should increase focus on the role of language learning strategies in promoting the acquisition of English language proficiency. The study also opens up avenues for more studies on language learning strategies not only in Jordan, but also in other countries where this area of study is lacking.
Downloads
References
Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies: a Case of Jordan University of Science and Technology.
Al-Khasawneh, F. M. S. (2013). The Patterns of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Employed by EFL Learners at Jordan University of Science and Technology (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia).
Bremner, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 490-514.
Bruen, J. (2001). Strategies for success: Profiling the effective learner of German. Foreign Language Annals, 34(3), 216-225.
Burt, M. K., Dulay, H. C., &Finocchiaro. M. (Eds.). (1997). Viewpoints on English as a second language. New York. Regents Publishing Company.
Celic, S., &Toptas, V. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners. Paper presented at third international ELT conference: Telling ELT tales out of school, Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Education, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus.
Cengizhan, L. (2011). Vocabulary learning strategies: A case of Edrine Anatolian high school. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1870-1874.
Chamot, A.U. (2001). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. In M.P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 25-43). Harlow, England: Longman.
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Verbal Language and Verbal Behavior, 1(1), 14-26.
Chamot, A. U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children‘s learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 319-338.
Chou, Y. (2002). An exploratory study of language learning strategies and the relationship of these strategies to motivation and language proficiency among EFL Taiwanese technological and vocational college students. PhD Dissertation. University of Iowa.
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL quarterly, 185-209.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
Abdul Ghani, K., Mahfuz, M. S., &MdSaad, A. J. (2014). Relationship between the usage of language learning strategies and the level of proficiency in learning Arabic Ab Initio. Asian Social Science, 10(9), 262-275.
Grainger, P. (1997). Language-learning strategies for learners of Japanese: Investigating ethnicity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 378–385.
Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367-383.
Gu, P., & Johnson, R. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
Gu, Y., Wen, Q., & Wu, D. (1995). How often is often? Reference ambiguities of the Likert-scale in language learning strategy research. English Language Teaching, 5, 19–35.
Hong-Nam., &Leavell, G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34, 399-415.
Kalajahi, S. A. R., Nimehchisalem, V., &Pourshahian, B. (2012). How do English language learners apply language learning strategies in different proficiency levels? A Case of Turkish EFL students. Language in India, 12(10).
Khalil, A. (2005). Assessment of language learning strategies used by Palestinian EFL learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 108-119.
Kudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies. Honolulu: University of HawaiSecond Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Lan, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41, 339-379.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Second language teaching methods in B. Spolsky (ed.). The concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
Magogwe, J. & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338-352
Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H., &Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner (Research in Education Series No. 17). Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Nisbet, D. L., Tindall, E., & Arroyo, A. A. (2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 100 -107.
Nyikos, M., & Oxford, R. (1993). A factor analytic study of language learning strategy use: Interpretation from information processing theory and social psychology. Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 11-22.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R. L. (ed.) (1999). Language learning motivation: pathways to the new century. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Oxford, R., &Ehrman, M. (1995). Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23(3), 359-386.
Oxford, R. L. &Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal 73 (3): 291-300.
Peacock, M., &Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 179-200.
Platsidou, M., &Sipitanou, A. (2014). Exploring relationships with grade level, gender and language proficiency in the foreign language learning strategy use of children and early adolescents. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4, 83-96.
Politzer, R. L., &McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 103-123.
Rong, M. (1999) Language learning strategies of a sample of tertiary-level students in the P. R. China. Guidelines, 21(1), 1–11.
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research, history, and typology. In A. L. Wenden& J. Rubin (Eds), Learner strategies in language learning, (pp. 15-30), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Shmais, W. (2003). Language learning strategy use in Palestine. TESL-EJ, 7(2). Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej26/a3.html
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, J. (1993). Research issues: Using Likert scales in L2 research. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 736-739.
Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) Listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387-409.
Vann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly 24(2), 177-198.
Vrettou, A. (2011). Patterns of language learning strategy use by Greek-speaking young learners of English. Unpublished PhD thesis: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50(2), 203-244.
Williams, M., &Burder, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2016 Eshraq Mahmoud Mustafa Jaradat, Haryati Bakrin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
