Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Literacy based Character and Professionalism Enhancement for Educators in Facing Industrial Revolution 4.0
Articles

Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar
Constructivism Learning Model to improve students' mathematical understanding and communication skills in elementary school


Roni Rodiyana
Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia
Wina Dwi Puspitasari
Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published October 30, 2019
Keywords
  • Constructivism Learning Model,
  • Student Understanding,
  • Mathematical Communication
How to Cite
Rodiyana, R., & Puspitasari, W. D. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 2(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v2i1.2409

Abstract

One effort that can be done in addressing the low ability of mathematical understanding and communication, namely with constructivism learning models that emphasize students to construct their own knowledge. This research is an experimental study in Class IV of Cijati Elementary School and First District of Majalengka with a pretest and posttest research design given to the experimental group and the control group. The instruments used were tests of mathematical comprehension and communication skills, student attitude scales, teacher response questionnaires, and the observation format of student learning activities. The main objective of this study is to examine the mathematical comprehension and communication skills of elementary students who learn with constructivism learning and those who learn as usual. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively and qualitatively. Based on the results of the final test analysis, it was found that students' mathematical understanding and communication skills learning with the constructivism learning model were better than students who studied with ordinary learning. Student learning outcomes in the experimental group were at a level close enough to good and the learning outcomes control group was still at a lesser level. While qualitative analysis found that student learning activities in constructivism learning models are good. Students and teachers show a positive attitude towards this learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ajisukmo, C RP. (1992). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif menurut Piaget dan Aplikasinya dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Atma Jaya.
  2. As’ari, A. (2001). Representasi: Pentingnya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Matematika: UNM.
  3. Asikin, M. (2001). Komunikasi Matematik dalam Realistic Mathematics Education. Makalah disajikan dalam seminar Nasional RME.
  4. Asikin, M. (2002). Pendidikan Matematika Pada Era Otonomi Daerah. Makalah Disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional dalam Rangka Konterda Himpunan Matematika di Indonesia. Semarang: Wilayah Jateng.
  5. Depdikbud. (1994). Garis-Garis Besar Program Pengajaran Mata Pelajaran Matematika SD. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
  6. Hodoyo, H. (2001). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. JICA: UNM.
  7. Kariadinata, R. (2001). Peningkatan Pemahaman dan Kemampuan Analogi Matematika melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Tesis UPI Bandung. Tidak diterbitkan.
  8. Marpaung, Y. (2000). Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Matematika di SD. Proceding Konperensi Nasional X Matematika. ITB, 17-20 Juli 2000.
  9. Ruseffendi, ET. (1998). Statistik Dasar untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: IKIP Bandung.
  10. Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kanisius.
  11. Suherman, E dkk. (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. JICA. UPI Bandung.
  12. Sumarmo, U. (2003). Pembelajaran Ketrampilan Membaca Matematika. Makalah disampaikan pada Pelatihan Nasional Training of Trainer bagi guru Bahasa Indonesia dan Matematika SLTP. Bandung.
  13. Sriyono. (1992). Teknik Belajar Mengajar dalam CBSA. Jakarta: Rinika Cipta.
  14. Turmudi. (1997). Konstruktivisme. Pandangan Baru dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Makalah. Bandung: IKIP Bandung.
  15. Zulkardi. (2001). Realistic Mathematics Education (RME). Teori, Contoh Pembelajaran dan Taman Belajar di Internet. Makalah: UPI Bandung.