Dataset: Unveiling the Top Performers in Digital Forensics Research Dataset: Mengungkap Performa Terbaik dalam Penelitian Forensik Digital
- Lens.org,
- digital forensics,
- computer security,
- Netherlands Forensic Institute
Copyright (c) 2023 Annisa Eka Safitri, Mochammad Tanzil Multazam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In this study, researchers analysed scientific journal articles in the field of digital forensics and law through the Lens.org website. The purpose of this study is to find the best universities, years, fields of study, authors, countries/regions, publishers, and journals in this field. The method used was to filter journal articles based on document type, data range, and field of study. The study results show that the University of Lausanne is the best institution in this field, 2021 is the year of the most journals, the field of computer security is the best field of study, the Netherlands Forensic Institute is the most active institution, Eoghan Casey is the most active author, the United Kingdom is the most active country/region, and Elsevier is the best publisher. The scientific impact of this study is to provide an overview of the best journal articles in the field of digital forensics and law, so that it can help researchers or practitioners in choosing quality information sources.
Highlights:
- University of Lausanne was the top institution for digital forensics with 46 articles published.
- Computer Security was the top field of study with 454 articles published.
- The most active author was Eoghan Casey with 36 articles published.
Downloads
References
- B. Martini, and K-K. R. Choo, "An Integrated Conceptual Digital Forensic Framework for Cloud Computing," Journal of Digital Investigation, vol. 9, 2012.
- M. Kohn, M. M. Eloff, and J. H. P. Eloff, "Integrated Digital Forensic Process Model," Journal of Computers and Security, vol. 38, 2013.
- A. Arrifin, H. Jazri, J. Slay, and I. Lee, "Digital Forensics Institute in Malaysia: The Way Forward," Journal of Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, vol. 9, 2014.
- G. C. Kessler, "Are Mobile Device Examinations Practiced Like 'Forensics'?" Journal of Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, vol. 12, 2015.
- G. Oparnica, "Digital Evidence and Digital Forensic Education," Journal of Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, vol. 13, 2016.
- M. Tajbakhsh, E. Homayounvala, and S. Shokouhyar, "Forensically Ready Digital Identity Management Systems, Issues of Digital Identity Life Cycle and Context of Usage," International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, vol. 9, 2017.
- G. Horsman, "Framework for Reliable Experimental Design (FRED): A Research Framework to Ensure the Dependable Interpretation of Digital Data for Digital Forensics," Journal of Computers & Security, vol. 73, 2018.
- N. Sunde, and I. E. Dror, "Cognitive and Human Factors in Digital Forensics: Problems, Challenges, and the Way Forward," Journal of Digital Investigation, vol. 29, 2019.
- E. Casey, and T. R. Souvignet, "Digital Transformation Risk Management in Forensic Science Laboratories," Journal of Forensic Science International, vol. 316, 2020.
- S. McCullough, S. Abudu, E. Onwubuariri, and I. Baggili, "Another Brick in the Wall: An Exploratory Analysis of Digital Forensics Programs in the United States," Journal of Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 37, 2021.
- R. Stoykova, S. Andersen, K. Franke, and S. Axelsson, "Reliability Assessment of Digital Forensic Investigation in the Norwegian Police," Journal of Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 40, 2022.