Vol 11 (2022): Proceedings of Data Article on Law Science
Data Articles in Law Science

Dataset: Global Trends in Digital Forensics and Fingerprint Research: A Comprehensive Analysis
Dataset: Tren Global dalam Penelitian Forensik Digital dan Sidik Jari: Analisis Komprehensif


Aulia Sarah Azizah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Bio
Mochammad Tanzil Multazam
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Bio
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published November 30, 2022
Keywords
  • Data set,
  • Fingerprints,
  • Digital Forensic,
  • Literature review
How to Cite
Azizah, A. S., & Multazam, M. T. (2022). Dataset: Global Trends in Digital Forensics and Fingerprint Research: A Comprehensive Analysis. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 11, 10.21070/icecrs.v11i0.1497. https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs.v11i0.1497

Abstract

The purpose of retrieving this data is to determine the number of journal articles related to digital forensics and fingerprinting. Through lens.org analysis with appropriate keywords and filters, 133 relevant documents were found. The study revealed that the University of Lausanne is the most active institution in this field, with the most research in 2019. The most explored fields of study include forensic science and computer security. The most active countries in this research were the UK, the US, and Switzerland. These results suggest that this data can serve as a quick guide to further research and development methods, such as forensic 3D modelling and photogrammetry. In addition, this data is useful for authors, readers, and researchers interested in the topic of digital forensics and fingerprinting.

Highlights:

  1. Dominant institutions and countries: University of Lausanne leads the research, with the United Kingdom, United States, and Switzerland as the most active countries.
  2. Peak research activity: The highest number of journal articles published in 2019, focusing on various aspects of digital forensics and fingerprinting.
  3. Interdisciplinary exploration: Research spans across forensic sciences, computer security, and law, indicating diverse applications and implications of digital forensics and fingerprinting techniques.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. S. Baechler dkk., “Forensic intelligence framework. Part II: Study of the main generic building blocks and challenges through the examples of illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring,” Forensic Science International, vol. 250, hlm. 44–52, Mei 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.02.021.
  2. S. Carr, E. Piasecki, dan A. Gallop, “Demonstrating reliability through transparency: A scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings,” Forensic Science International, vol. 308, hlm. 110110, Mar 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110110.
  3. P. Fussey, B. Davies, dan M. Innes, “‘Assisted’ Facial Recognition and the Reinvention of Suspicion and Discretion in Digital Policing,” The British Journal of Criminology, vol. 61, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Mar 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa068.
  4. W. van Helmond, M. P. V. Begieneman, R. Kniest, dan M. de Puit, “Classification of condom lubricants in cyanoacrylate treated fingerprints by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry,” Forensic Sci Int, vol. 305, hlm. 110005, Des 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110005.
  5. V. Kumari, M. K. Thakar, B. Mondal, dan S. K. Pal, “Effects of oils, lotions, hand sanitizers, and mehendi on fingerprints captured through digital fingerprint scanner,” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, hlm. 8, Mei 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41935-021-00222-w.
  6. F. Breitinger, X. Zhang, dan D. Quick, “A forensic analysis of rclone and rclone’s prospects for digital forensic investigations of cloud storage,” Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 43, hlm. 10, doi: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301443.
  7. E. Enzinger dan G. S. Morrison, “Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case,” Forensic Science International, vol. 277, hlm. 30–40, Agu 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.05.007.
  8. I. Kara, “Read the digital fingerprints: log analysis for digital forensics and security,” Computer Fraud & Security, vol. 2021, no. 7, hlm. 11–16, Jul 2021, doi: 10.1016/S1361-3723(21)00074-9.
  9. A. Girod, R. Ramotowski, S. Lambrechts, P. Misrielal, M. Aalders, dan C. Weyermann, “Fingermark age determinations: Legal considerations, review of the literature and practical propositions,” Forensic Science International, vol. 262, hlm. 212–226, Mei 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.021.
  10. A. Girod, R. Ramotowski, dan C. Weyermann, “Composition of fingermark residue: A qualitative and quantitative review,” Forensic Science International, vol. 223, no. 1, hlm. 10–24, Nov 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.018.