Proceedings of The ICECRS
Vol 12 No 1 (2023): Proceedings of Data in Education, Culture, and Interdisciplinary Studies
Data Articles in Law Science

Digital Forensic Methods: Unraveling Scholarly Trends in Legal Contexts
Metode Forensik Digital: Mengungkap Tren Ilmiah dalam Konteks Hukum


  • Sephia Mayasari,
  • Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy,
  • Irta Fiddina
Sephia Mayasari
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Irta Fiddina
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs.v12i2.1525
Published October 13, 2023
Keywords
  • Digital Forensic,
  • Methods,
  • Scholarly Landscape,
  • Interdisciplinary Research,
  • Legal Methodologies
How to Cite
Mayasari, S., Phahlevy, R. R., & Fiddina, I. (2023). Digital Forensic Methods: Unraveling Scholarly Trends in Legal Contexts. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs.v12i2.1525

Copyright (c) 2023 Sephia Mayasari, Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study scrutinizes 264 scholarly articles from 2012 to 2022, exploring the intersection of digital forensics and legal methodologies. Noteworthy findings reveal prolific contributions from institutions like the University of Lausanne and University College Dublin, showcasing 2019 as a peak year with 42 publications. Computer Science dominates, encompassing 223 articles, with Graeme Horsman emerging as a prominent author with 13 publications. The UK leads in scholarly activity, generating 74 articles, while Elsevier stands out as the primary publisher with 145 articles. This research serves as a vital resource, offering guidance for further exploration in the dynamic realm of digital forensics and legal methods.

Highlights :

  • Analysis of 264 articles at the intersection of digital forensics and legal methodologies
  • Reveals notable contributions from specific institutions and leading authors
  • Offers guidance for further exploration in this dynamic field

Keywords: Digital Forensic, Methods, Scholarly Landscape, Interdisciplinary Research, Legal Methodologies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. M. Moore and S. Iveson, "Digital Forensics Specialist Group," Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, vol. 9, no. 0, pp. 1-1, Jan. 28, 2014.
  2. P. S. Raskar and S. K. Shah, "Methods for forgery detection in digital forensics," International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 528-528, 2021.
  3. M. Köhn, M. M. Eloff, and J. H. P. Eloff, "Integrated digital forensic process model," Computers & Security, vol. 38, pp. 103-115, 2013.
  4. K. C. Odogwu, P. Gladyshev, and B. Habibnia, "PNG Data Detector for DECA," Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 32, pp. 300910, 2020.
  5. P. Sommer, "Accrediting digital forensics: what are the choices?," Digital Investigation, vol. 25, pp. 116-120, 2018.
  6. Z. Zhuo, "Novel image watermarking method based on FRWT and SVD," International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 97-97, 2018.
  7. K. J. Conlan, I. Baggili, and F. Breitinger, "Anti-forensics," Digital Investigation, vol. 18, pp. 1-1, 2016.
  8. O. Khalind, J. C. Hernandez-Castro, and B. Aziz, "A study on the false positive rate of Stegdetect," Digital Investigation, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 235-245, 2013.
  9. H. Chung, J. Park, and S. Lee, "Digital forensic approaches for Amazon Alexa ecosystem," Digital Investigation, vol. 22, pp. 1-1, 2017.
  10. G. Horsman and N. Sunde, "Part 1: The need for peer review in digital forensics," Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 35, pp. 301062, 2020.