Cyber Law & Human Behavior: Global Insights
Hukum Cyber & Perilaku Manusia: Wawasan Global
-
(1) * Febrian Dwi Firmansyah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(2) Sri Budi Purwaningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(3) Rizqi Hasan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This dataset, "Cyber Law and Behavioral Reactions," sourced from lens.org, compiles 3,194 journal articles focusing on the intersection of Cyber Law and human behavior. Through meticulous curation and analysis, this dataset highlights global research trends, emphasizing Psychology as a central field of study and the prevalence of open-access scholarly works. Dominated by institutions like Erasmus University Rotterdam and authors like Didier Bigo, the dataset's focus on the United States offers diverse perspectives. The dataset's goal was to explore the nuances of Cyber Law's impact on human behavior. Methodologically, rigorous step-by-step data collection and analysis were employed. Results underscore Psychology's prominence and the prevalence of open-access works. The dataset's implications make it an invaluable resource for researchers delving into Cyber Law's intricate relationship with human behavior.
Highlights :
- Comprehensive dataset on Cyber Law and human behavior trends
- Emphasizes Psychology's centrality and prevalence of open-access works
- Valuable resource for understanding Cyber Law's impact on human behavior
Keywords: Cyber Law, Human Behavior, Dataset, Psychology, Open Access
Downloads
References
M. Warr, “Life-Course Transitions and Desistance From Crime,” Criminology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 183–216, 1998.
C. R. Sunstein, “Social Norms and Social Roles,” Columbia Law Rev., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 903–968, 1996.
D. J. Solove, “A Taxonomy of Privacy,” Univ. Pa. Law Rev, vol. 154, no. 3, p. 477, Jan. 2006.
T. Risse-Kappen, “Ideas do not float freely: transnational coalitions, domestic structures, and the end of the cold war,” Int. Organ, vol. 48, no. 02, pp. 185–214, 1994.
G. Palazzo and A. G. Scherer, “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework,”J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 71–88, May 2006.
M. D. McCubbins, R. G. Noll, and B. R. Weingast, “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies,” Va. Law Rev, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 431–482, 1989.
E. D. Mansfield and D. C. Mutz, “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety,” Int. Organ., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 425–457, Jul. 2009.
J. K. Caird, C. Willness, P. Steel, and C. T. Scialfa, “A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance,” Accid. Anal. Prev, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1282–1293, Feb. 2008.
B. H. Bornstein, “The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?,”Law Hum. Behav, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 75–91, 1999.
J. Anable, "Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory,” Transp. Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2005.
Copyright (c) 2023 Febrian Dwi Firmansyah, Sri Budi Purwaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
