Vol 12 No 1 (2023): Proceedings of Data in Education, Culture, and Interdisciplinary Studies
Data Articles in Law Science

Global Trends in Cyberlaw and Online Ads: A Data Analysis
Perkembangan Global dalam Cyberlaw dan Iklan Online: Analisis Data

Tresnia Octaviani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Mochammad Tanzil Multazam
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Rizqi Hasan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published October 12, 2023
  • Cyberlaw,
  • Online Ads,
  • Scholarly Output,
  • User Awareness,
  • Online Threats
How to Cite
Octaviani, T., Multazam, M. T., & Hasan, R. (2023). Global Trends in Cyberlaw and Online Ads: A Data Analysis. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs.v12i2.1645


This data article examines the landscape of cyberlaw research through a comprehensive analysis of journal articles focused on "cyberlaw" and "online ads." Utilizing Lens.org, articles within the "law" subject category were filtered and exported in CSV and BibTeX formats. The study identifies prolific contributors, active countries, and prominent publishers in this field, shedding light on the scholarly output. Additionally, it evaluates the efficacy of four warning banners in mitigating distributed denial-of-service attacks, underscoring the significance of user awareness in combating online threats. The findings highlight the dynamic nature of cyberlaw and its pivotal role in addressing contemporary online challenges.

Higlights :

  • Research Landscape: Reveals contributors, active countries, and publishers in cyberlaw research.
  • User Awareness in Threat Mitigation: Evaluates warning banners' efficacy against cyberattacks.
  • Dynamic Nature of Cyberlaw: Highlights its crucial role in addressing evolving online challenges.

Keywords: Cyberlaw, Online Ads, Scholarly Output, User Awareness, Online Threats


Download data is not yet available.


  1. A. Moneva, E. R. Leukfeldt, and W. Klijnsoon, “Alerting consciences to reduce cybercrime: a quasi-experimental design using warning banners.,” J. Exp. Criminol., pp. 1-, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11292-022-09504-2.
  2. B. Sander and N. Tsagourias, “The covid-19 Infodemic and Online Platforms as Intermediary Fiduciaries under International Law,” J. Int. Humanit. Leg. Stud., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 331–347, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1163/18781527-01102002.
  3. A. Scardamaglia and A. Daly, “Google, online search and consumer confusion in Australia,” Int. J. Law Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 203–228, May 2016, doi: 10.1093/ijlit/eaw004.
  4. N. Leontiadis and A. Hutchings, “Scripting the crime commission process in the illicit online prescription drug trade,” J. Cybersecurity, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–92, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1093/cybsec/tyv006.
  5. L. F. Cranor, “Can Users Control Online Behavioral Advertising Effectively,” IEEE Secur. Priv. Mag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 2012, doi: 10.1109/msp.2012.32.
  6. A. Oboler and K. Connelly, “Building SMARTER Communities of Resistance and Solidarity,” Cosmop. Civ. Soc. Interdiscip. J., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 99–118, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.5130/ccs.v10i2.6035.
  7. M. Kaakinen, P. Räsänen, M. Näsi, J. Minkkinen, T. Keipi, and A. Oksanen, “Social capital and online hate production: A four country survey,” Crime Law Soc. Change, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 25–39, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10611-017-9764-5.
  8. H. Y. Chan, “Refusing Treatment Prior to Becoming Incapacitated: Supported Decision-making as an Approach in Advance Directives,” Eur. J. Health Law, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24–42, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1163/15718093-12460332.
  9. E. Mik, “The Erosion of Autonomy in Online Consumer Transactions,” Law Innov. Technol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–38, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/17579961.2016.1161893.
  10. S. Vidros, C. Kolias, and G. Kambourakis, “Online recruitment services: another playground for fraudsters,” Comput. Fraud Secur., vol. 2016, no. 3, pp. 8–13, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s1361-3723(16)30025-2.