Insights into Cyberlaw and Lifestyle: Scholarly Analysis Dataset
Wawasan atas Hukum Siber dan Gaya Hidup: Kumpulan Data Analisis Akademis
Abstract
This data article offers an insightful examination of scholarly articles sourced from lens.org, focusing on Cyberlaw, Cyber, Law, and Lifestyle. Employing specific keyword searches, document type filters, and subject categorization, the dataset, available in CSV and BibTeX formats via Zenodo, aims to quantify relevant journal articles, identify top affiliations, active countries, and prevalent publishers. Notably, the analysis unveils the prominence of the London School of Economics and Political Science, emphasizing data security and European Court of Justice rulings. Furthermore, a surge in publications, particularly centered on online privacy and racism, peaked in 2017. This dataset provides an essential resource for researchers, students, and organizations delving into these intersecting domains, shedding light on trends and pivotal contributors in the field.
Highlight:
- Dominant Institution: London School of Economics and Political Science's significant presence, emphasizing data security and European Court of Justice rulings.
- Publication Trends: Sharp increase in articles, especially concerning online privacy and racism, peaking in 2017.
- Resource Utility: Valuable reference for researchers, students, and organizations interested in the intersection of Cyberlaw, Cyber, Law, and Lifestyle.
Keywords: Cyberlaw, Lifestyle, Scholarly Articles, Data Analysis, London School of Economics
Downloads
References
D. P. Anugerah dan M. Indriani, “Data Protection in Financial Technology Services (A Study in Indonesian Legal Perspective),” Sriwij. Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, hlm. 82–92, Jan 2018, doi: 10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss1.112.pp82-92.
O. Lynskey, “Control over Personal Data in a Digital Age: Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja Gonzalez,” Mod. Law Rev., vol. 78, no. 3, hlm. 522–534, Mei 2015, doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12126.
A. Jakubowicz, “Alt_Right White Lite: Trolling, Hate Speech and Cyber Racism on Social Media,” Cosmop. Civ. Soc. Interdiscip. J., vol. 9, no. 3, hlm. 41–60, Des 2017, doi: 10.5130/ccs.v9i3.5655.
L. Collingwood dan G. Broadbent, “Offending and being offended online : vile messages, jokes and the law,” Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 31, no. 6, hlm. 763–772, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2015.08.002.
T. Murphy dan N. Whitty, “Crowning Glory: Public Law, Power and the Monarchy:,” Soc. Leg. Stud., vol. 9, no. 1, hlm. 7–27, 2000, doi: 10.1177/096466390000900102.
A. Schepard dan R. E. Emery, “October 2014: Editorial Notes,” Fam. Court Rev., vol. 52, no. 4, hlm. 623–626, Okt 2014, doi: 10.1111/fcre.12111.
L. Cominelli dan C. Lucchiari, “Italian Mediators in Action : the Impact of Style and Attitude,” Confl. Resolut. Q., vol. 35, no. 2, hlm. 223–242, Sep 2017, doi: 10.1002/crq.21206.
M. Thorburn, “Justifications, Powers, and Authority,” Yale Law J., vol. 117, no. 6, hlm. 1070-, Apr 2008, doi: 10.2307/20454675.
A. E. Taslitz, “The Fourth Amendment in the Twenty-First Century: Technology, Privacy, and Human Emotions,” Law Contemp. Probl., vol. 65, no. 2, hlm. 125–188, 2002, doi: 10.2307/1192242.
J. Sanders dan J. Machal-Fulks, “The Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis Testimony to Prove Causation in Toxic Tort Cases: The Interplay of Adjective and Substantive Law,” Law Contemp. Probl., vol. 64, no. 4, hlm. 107–138, 2001, doi: 10.2307/1192293.
Copyright (c) 2023 Alif Islam, Emy Rosnawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
