Vol 3 (2019): Global Education: Perspectives, Innovations, Issues, and Challenges
Articles

Personaliti Dan Kepimpinan Ulul Amri Guru Pendidikan Islam


Mardzelah binti Makhsin
Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan dan Bahasa Moden, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Noriana Binti Abdullah
Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan dan Bahasa Moden, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published November 16, 2019
Keywords
  • Personality; Leadership; Ulul Amri; Teacher; Islamic studies,
  • leadership,
  • personality,
  • ulul amri,
  • teacher,
  • islamic studies
  • ...More
    Less
How to Cite
Makhsin, M. binti, & Abdullah, N. B. (2019). Personaliti Dan Kepimpinan Ulul Amri Guru Pendidikan Islam. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 3. https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs.v3i0.18

Abstract

This article aims to review and identify the characteristics of Ulul Amri's personality and    leadership among Islamic Education teachers. A total of 109 students from 4 secondary schools in Kota Bharu district were randomly selected as respondents for the study. This study was conducted through a quantitative approach. The data were collected through a questionnaire translated from The Big Five Inventory (BFI) by John (1990) and Ulul Amri's Leadership following the Qur'an. The degree of reliability of the BFI instrument ranges from 0.62 to 0.77 while the Ulul Amri Leadership instrument is between 0.61 and 0.71. Descriptive analysis of frequencies and mins used for distribution analysis. Inference statistics that pearson correlation analysis is used to analyze the relationship between teacher personality and Ulul Amri Leadership. The significant level used is 0.05. The findings show that the most dominant personality dimensions of teachers are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism. The results of the correlation test showed that there was no significant relationship between the personality of the Islamic Education Teacher and the leadership of the Ulul Amri teacher except the personality of the agreeableness. The findings show that Islamic Education teachers have positive personalities such as Openness, Agreeableness, Extraversion and Conscientiousness. Meanwhile, Neuroticism with a negative personality teacher of Islamic Education has recorded the lowest mean. This finding shows that Islamic Education teachers in Kota Bharu have a good and positive perception among students. This is also a reflection of the expectation and dependence of the students on the Islamic Education teacher is very high. As Al-Qabisi's theory emphasizes the four qualities of a quality teacher in educating morals, ie by example, qudwah, unity, demonstration and understanding. Teachers through a qudwah approach or exemplary example can become themselves as followers or model roles to students by means of interaction inside and outside the classroom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abdul Halim El Muhammadi. (1991). Pendidikan Islam, Falsafah, disiplin dan Peranan Pendidik. Petaling Jaya: Dewan Pustaka Islam.
[2] Abd.Rahim Abd Rashid. (2007). Profesionalisme Keguruan: Prospek dan Cabaran: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.
[3] Ahmad Amri Zainal. (2009). Rahsia Personaliti Unggul: PTS Distributors Sdn Bhd.
[4] Azhani Adnan. (2008). Personaliti Guru: Pengaruh Ke atas Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Jurnal Sarjana.
[5] Azizi Yahaya. (2006). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: PTS Distributors Sdn Bhd.
[6] Azlan Bin Aris. (2009). Perbandingan Pola Personaliti-persekitaran (p-e Fit) dan Kongruen Personaliti Persekitaran (eat) pelajar Kolej Komuniti Segamat, Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana.
[7] Azlina Mohd Kosnin`& Tan Sew Lee. (2008). Pengaruh Personaliti Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dan Stress Kerja Guru.Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 48(E), Jun, 33-47
[8] Azilah Abdul Rahman (2010) Hubungan antara Personaliti dan Gaya Pengajaran Guru dengan Pencapaian Matematik PMR.Satu Kajian di sekolah Menengah Daerah Kota Tinggi. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana.
[9] Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah. (2018). Data Guru Pendidikan Islam Kota Bharu.Jabatan Pendidikan Negeri Kelantan.
[10]
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan (2012). Data Salah Laku Displin Murid.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia
[11] Baharuddin & Umiarso. (2006). Kepimpinan Pendidikan Islam Antara Teori dan Praktik. Joajakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
[12] Bonar Hutu pea (2012). Sifat keperibadian dan dukungan Organisasi sebagai predictor Komitman Organisasi, guru pria di sekolah dasar. Makara, Sosial Humaniora Volume 16,No 2 Disember.101-115.
[13] Chong Chee Kong. (2003). Hubungan antara sikap, minat danpersepsi dengan prestasi matematik pelajar Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan Confucian Kuala Lumpur. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda.
[14] Ghazali Darulsalam. (2012). Kualiti Guru Pendidikan Islam di Malaysia. Monograf Universiti Malaya.
[15] Gordon W. Alport, Pettern and Growth in Personaliti (1961). New York: Holt, Rinehart And Winston.
[16] Habibah Elias & Noran Yaakub. (2006). Psikologi Personaliti: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.
[17] Haliza Hamzah & Joy Nesamalar. (2008). Pengurusan Bilik Darjah Dan Tingkah Laku: Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd.
[18] Helen Anak Malaka. (2006). Hubungan Personaliti-persekitaran dengan pencapaian Akademik Pelajar. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana.
[19] Hii Lu Kong. (2006). Hubungan antara minat, sikap, pengajaran guru dan penggunaan bahasa Inggeris sebagai bahasa pengantar dengan pencapaian matematik dalam kalangan pelajar Tingkatan Empat Di Bandaraya Miri, Sarawak. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana.
[20] Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. (2010) Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
[21] Kamarul Azmi Jasmi. (2011). Pendidikan Islam: Cabaran Alaf Baru. Seminar Pendidikan Islam al-Madrasah 30 Oktober.Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya.
[22] Khairiah Bt. Warman. (2003). Hubungan Kepimpinan Guru Dengan Pembentukan Personaliti Pelajar Dalam Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda.
[23] Khalip Musa & Hariza Abd Halim (2015) Kemahiran Interpersonal Guru Hubungan Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan .40(2)89-99.
[24] Khairul Anuar A. Rahman. (2012). Disposisi Guru Berkesan: Personaliti dan Kemahiran Komunikasi. Artikel Akademika82(2):37-44.
[25] Mohamad Khairi Hj Othman, Asmawati Suhid & Samsilah Roslan. (2015). Penghayatan nilai murni dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah masa kini. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial Jilid 18(Jun) 1-20.
[26] Muhammad Harfin Zuhdi. (2014). Konsep Kepimpinan Dalam Perspektif Islam, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN),Jurnal Akademika.Vol 19.N0 01Januari
[27] Norhaiza Binti Tahir. (2015) Hubungan Personaliti guru terhadap kemahiran sains Pelajar. Universiti tun Hussein Onn. Tesis Sarjana.
[28 Omar, N. N. (2013). Ciri-Ciri Personaliti Dan Sifat Kepimpinan Pengetua Kolej Kediaman Yang Cemerlang Dari Perspektif Pelaja.r Projek Sarjana: Universiti tun Hussein Onn Malaysiar
[29] Utusan Malaysia. Masalah sosial membimbangkan. (2007, 17 April). Dimuat turun pada 2 Jan 2018, dari http://blis2. bernama.com.eserv.uum.edu.my/mainHome Bypass.do