Abstract

This study aims to describe the role of the principal in creating an effective school at SMA Al Fattah Buduran Sidoarjo. The method used to determine the informant is purposive aside. In this qualitative research data collection, the authors use the interview, documentation and observation methods. From the results of this study, it was concluded that the Principal played a role in creating an effective school at Al Fattah Buduran Sidoarjo High School. Effective schools are schools that have good management standards, are transparent, are responsive, and accountable, and are able to empower every important component of the school. This is proven by Al Fattah High School continuing to experience an increase in the number of students, facilities and infrastructure, as well as their achievements.

References

1. Bafadal, I. 2003. Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
2. Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Cawelti, G. & Protheroe, N. 2001. High Student Achievement: How Six School Districts Changed into High-Performance Systems. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
4. Conger, C.L., & Kanungo, R.N. 1998. Charismatic Leadership in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Creemers, B.P.M., & Reezigt, G.J. 1996. School Level Conditions Affecting the Effectiveness of Instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, hal. 197-228.
6. Daft, R.L. & Streers. 1986. Organizing Theory and Design. (2nd ed.). St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
7. Davis, G.A. & Thomas, M.A. 1989. Effective Schools and Effective Teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8. DeRoche, E.F. 1985. An Administrator’s Guide for Evaluating Programs and Personnel: An Effective Schools Approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9. Direktorat Pendidikan Dasar. 1997. Pola dan Strategi Pembinaan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Dasar.
10. Dubin, A.E. 1991. The Principal as Chief Executive Officer. New York: The Falmer Press.
11. Ewell, P.T. & Lisensky, R.P. 1988. Assesing Institutional Effectiveness: Redirecting the Self-Study Process. Boulder, Colorado: NCHEMS.
12. Finn, J. D. & Achilles, C. M. 1999. Tennessee’s Class Size Study: Findings, Implycations, Misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), hal. 104-105.
13. Ford, M. 1992. Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
14. Frymier, J., Cronbleth, C., Gansneder, B.M., Jeter, J.T., Klein, M.F., Schwab, M., & Alexander, W.M. 1984. One Hundred Good Schools. West Lafayette, Indiana: Delta Phi Kappa.
15. Gezi, K. 1990. The Role of Leadership in Innercity Schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 12 (4), hal. 4-11.
16. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. 2002. Primal Leadership: Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17. Gorton, R.A. & Schneider, G.T. 1990. School-Based Leadership: Challenges and Opportunities. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company.
18. Greenfield, W.D. 1987. Instructional Leadership: Concepts, Issues, and Controversies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. 1996. Reassessing the Principal’s Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32 (1), hal. 5-44.