Proceedings of The ICECRS
Vol 11 (2022): Proceedings of Data Article on Law Science
Data Articles in Law Science

Dataset: Mapping Online Business and Commitment: Insights from Global Scholarly Works
Dataset: Pemetaan Bisnis dan Komitmen Online: Wawasan dari Karya Ilmiah Global


View Article
  • Regita Amanah Huzairin,
  • Mochammad Tanzil Multazam
Regita Amanah Huzairin
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Mochammad Tanzil Multazam
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs.v11i0.1434
Published December 28, 2022
Keywords
  • analysis,
  • institutions,
  • scholarly works,
  • commitment,
  • Online business
How to Cite
Huzairin, R. A., & Multazam, M. T. (2022). Dataset: Mapping Online Business and Commitment: Insights from Global Scholarly Works. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 11, 10.21070/icecrs.v11i0.1434. https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs.v11i0.1434

Copyright (c) 2022 Regita Amanah Huzairin, Mochammad Tanzil Multazam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This data article presents the results of a search for scholarly works on online business and commitment using the Lens.org database. The data were collected by applying filters for document type and subject and exporting the resulting datasets to CSV and Bibtex files. The data were then analyzed and compiled using Zenodo.org. The data provide valuable insights into the contributions of different institutions, authors, fields of study, and countries to research on online business and commitment. The results show that the London School of Economics and Political Science is the institution that contributed the most data, with the field of political science being the most active area of research. The data also reveal that the United Kingdom is the country that provided the most data and that Springer Nature is the most prolific publisher of scholarly works on this topic. These findings can be useful for scholars, students, and practitioners interested in online business and commitment, and the data can be used for further research and experimentation.

Highlights:

  1. The data article presents search results on online business and commitment from the Lens.org database.
  2. The data provide insights on institutions, authors, fields of study, and countries that contribute to research on the topic.
  3. The findings can be useful for scholars, students, and practitioners interested in online business and commitment, and the data can be used for further research and experimentation.

 

 

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. M. G. Bridge, “Good Faith, the Common Law, and the CISG,” Unif. Law Rev., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 98–115, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1093/ulr/unw059.
  2. H. Nicholson, R. Beadle, and R. Slack, “Corporate Philanthropy as a Context for Moral Agency, a MacIntyrean Enquiry,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 589–603, May 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04188-7.
  3. C. Tan, “The curious case of regulating false news on Google,” Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 46, pp. 105738–105738, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105738.
  4. F. Terpan, “Soft law in the European Union-The changing nature of EU law,” Eur. Law J., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 68–96, May 2014, doi: 10.1111/eulj.12090.
  5. S. Mena, M. de Leede, D. Baumann, N. Black, S. Lindeman, and L. McShane, “Advancing the business and human rights agenda: Dialogue, empowerment, and constructive engagement,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 161–188, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0188-8.
  6. A. Schepard, “Domestic violence and the family court–Continuing dialogue and collaboration in the 21st century,” Fam. Court Rev., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 431–433, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00211.x.
  7. J. Joseph, H. Borland, M. Orlitzky, and A. Lindgreen, “Seeing Versus Doing: How Businesses Manage Tensions in Pursuit of Sustainability,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 349–370, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-4065-1.
  8. S. Saxby, “National archives and records – the legal and policy considerations for the UK,” Int. J. Priv. Law, vol. 3, no. 1/2, pp. 43-, 2010, doi: 10.1504/ijpl.2010.029602.
  9. A. Murray, K. Skene, and K. Haynes, “The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 369–380, May 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2.
  10. D. J. Solove, “A Taxonomy of Privacy,” Univ. Pa. Law Rev., vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 477-, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.2307/40041279.
  11. Z. Elkins, A. T. Guzman, and B. A. Simmons, “Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000,” Int. Organ., vol. 60, no. 04, pp. 811–846, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1017/s0020818306060279.
  12. M. T. Whitty, “The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam,” Br. J. Criminol., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 665–684, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1093/bjc/azt009.