Dataset: Unveiling the Landscape of Online Business and CSR Strategy Research: A Comprehensive Analysis
Dataset: Mengungkap Lanskap Bisnis Online dan Penelitian Strategi CSR: Analisis Komprehensif
Abstract
This data article investigates the prevalence of journal articles related to online business and CSR strategy. Using lens.org, a total of 4,929 documents were initially identified, which were further refined to 203 documents related to the law subject. The analysis reveals the most active institutions, authors, countries, and publishers in the field. The findings underscore the importance of business ethics and corporate social responsibility in the context of online businesses, providing valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and educators.
Highlights:
- The study identified 203 law-related journal articles focused on online business and CSR strategy.
- The University of Nottingham emerged as the top institution in the field, contributing significantly to business ethics and corporate social responsibility research.
- The analysis highlights the growing importance of business ethics and corporate social responsibility in the context of online businesses.
Downloads
References
R. Slager, S. Pouryousefi, J. Moon, dan E. D. Schoolman, “Sustainability Centres and Fit: How Centres Work to Integrate Sustainability Within Business Schools,” Journal of business ethics : JBE, vol. 161, no. 2, hlm. 375–391, Jan 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3965-4.
M. I. Jizi, A. Salama, R. Dixon, dan R. Stratling, “Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 125, no. 4, hlm. 601–615, Des 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2.
E. Laidlaw, “A Framework for Identifying Internet Information Gatekeepers,” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, hlm. 263–276, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13600869.2010.522334.
H. M. al-Khateeb, G. Epiphaniou, Z. A. Alhaboby, J. Barnes, dan E. Short, “Cyberstalking: Investigating formal intervention and the role of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 34, no. 4, hlm. 339–349, Jul 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.016.
R. Craven, “The Legal and Social Construction of Value in Government Procurement Markets,” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 47, no. 1, hlm. 29–59, Jan 2020, doi: 10.1111/jols.12211.
C. Havard dan A. Sobczak, “Stakeholders? Influence on French Unions? CSR Strategies,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 129, no. 2, hlm. 311–324, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2159-y.
A. Johnston, K. Amaeshi, E. Adegbite, dan O. Osuji, “Corporate social responsibility as obligated internalisation of social costs,” Journal of Business Ethics, Nov 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04329-y.
M. Humphreys dan A. D. Brown, “An analysis of corporate social responsibility at credit line: a narrative approach,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 80, no. 3, hlm. 403–418, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9426-0.
S. Du, V. Swaen, A. Lindgreen, dan S. Sen, “The Roles of Leadership Styles in Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 114, no. 1, hlm. 155–169, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1333-3.
A. Murray, K. Skene, dan K. Haynes, “The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 140, no. 3, hlm. 369–380, Feb 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2.
Copyright (c) 2022 Aulia Sarah Azizah, Mochammad Tanzil Multazam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.