Implementation of Active Reading Movement as a Strategy to Improve Literacy in SDN 1 Kunjang-Kediri
Implementasi Gerakan Aktif Membaca sebagai Strategi Peningkatan Literasi di SDN 1 Kunjang-Kediri
Abstract
General Background: The development of reading literacy is a fundamental aspect of improving the quality of basic education and fostering critical thinking skills among students. Specific Background: In response to low reading fluency and vocabulary comprehension among fifth and sixth-grade students, KKN-P Group 04 from Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo implemented an active reading movement at SDN 1 Kunjang, Ngancar District, Kediri Regency. Knowledge Gap: Despite nationwide literacy initiatives, structured and continuous programs that specifically address the dual challenges of reading fluency and vocabulary mastery in rural elementary schools remain limited. Aims: This study aims to enhance students’ reading skills and vocabulary understanding through a focused, participatory literacy intervention. Results: The program was conducted over four weeks, with daily sessions from Monday to Thursday and weekly evaluations on Fridays. Strategies included group reading activities, vocabulary discussions, and regular assessments. The intervention yielded significant improvements in both reading fluency and vocabulary comprehension, as evidenced by student progress charts and comprehensive activity documentation. Novelty: The program’s structured approach, combining daily engagement with continuous evaluation, offers a replicable model for literacy enhancement in elementary education. Implications: This initiative demonstrates that systematic literacy programs can effectively address foundational educational challenges and may serve as a practical reference for other schools aiming to improve student literacy outcomes through sustained and adaptive methods.
Keywords: Literacy, Reading Fluency, Vocabulary, KKN-P UMSIDA, Elementary Education
Highlights:
-
Daily structured reading activities boost student literacy.
-
Vocabulary discussions improve word comprehension significantly.
-
Replicable program model supports rural school literacy initiatives.
Downloads
References
S. Masitoh, “Blended Learning Berwawasan Literasi Digital Suatu Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran dan Membangun Generasi Emas 2045,” Proc. ICECRS, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 13–34, 2018, doi: 10.21070/picecrs.v1i3.1377.
N. Kurniawati, U. Suryakancana, U. Suryakancana, G. Ismiati, and U. Suryakancana, “Gerakan Literasi Menuju Neglasari Kahiji Melalui Program Read Aloud Untuk Meningkatkan Ipm Bidang,” PENMASKU Junal Pengabdi. Masy. Univ. Kuningan, vol. 1, pp. 13–21, 2021.
Erni Iwayantari, “PENERAPAN GERAKAN LITERASI SEKOLAH DALAMMENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMBACA PEMAHAMAN DANDAMPAKNYA TERHADAP UPAYA MENUMBUHKAN NILAI-NILAIKARAKTER DI SMPN 2 BOJONGSOANG,” 2021.
Y. R. Sari, E. T. Ayuh, and H. Gunawan, “Pengembangan Minat Baca Anak Melalui Latihan Membaca Di Desa Padang Pelasan,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 8, no. 1, 2025.
A. B. Citta, N. Ilmi, A. Muhammad, S. Idris, and U. Hasanuddin, “Pelatihan dan Pendampingan Literasi Bahasa Inggris Untuk Mendukung Kemajuan Masyarakat di Era Global Pada Masyarakat Kecamatan Manggala,” J. Pengabdi. Sos., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3486–3494, 2025.
N. K. Denzin and Lincoln, “Handbook of Qualitative Research,” Thousand Oaks, 2000.
N. Sari Burhan, I. Agus Basuki, and I. Artikel Abstrak, “Implementasi Tahap Pembiasaan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 367–373, 2020. pelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) sebagai Sistem Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Indonesia Inovatif di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3829–3840, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1415.
S. Kirana, S. Wiwikananda, and A. Briansyah, “Peran Guru Terhadap Keterampilan Membaca Melalui Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar,” 2024.
W. Dwi Aryani and H. Purnomo, “Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) Dalam Meningkatkan Budaya Membaca Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Edukasi Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 71–82, 2023.
C. D. Rohim and S. Rahmawati, “Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri,” Kaji. Pendidik. Dan Has. Penelit., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 2, 2020.
M. Pridayani and A. Rivauzi, “Faktor Pendukung dan Penghambat Pelaksanaan Program Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Religius Terhadap Siswa,” An-Nuha, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 329–341, 2022, doi: 10.24036/annuha.v2i2.188.
F. Muzzamil, “Pengaruh Lingkungan Terhadap Perkembangan Sosial Emosional Anak,” MURANGKALIH J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.35706/murangkalih.v2i02.5811.
M. Z. Rara, H. H. Liza, A. S. N. A. Asti, and R. R. F. Riri, “Challenges and Opportunities for Using Smartphones as Learning Media for Students of Islamic Education Study Program, State University of Jakarta,” J. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.58230/josse.v1i1.30.
M. Kanusta, Gerakan Literasi dan Minat Baca. CV. Azka Pustaka., 2021.
A. B. Putra, I. Nasution, and Y. Yahfizham, “Manajemen kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia di sekolah menengah pertama islam terpadu madani,” J. Educ. J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 435, 2024, doi: 10.29210/1202424376.
A. Zahiroh, “Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbicara Menggunakan Media Visual Pada Peserta Didik Kelas V Sdn Mekarjaya 14 Depok Skripsi,” 2022.
V. Safitri and F. Dafit, “Peran Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Dan Menulis Melalui Gerakan Literasi Di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1356–1364, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.938.
Y. Suchyadi, “Analisis Bimbingan Belajar Siswa Berkesulitan Membaca,” J. Soc. Stud. Arts Humanit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 2022, doi: 10.33751/jssah.v2i2.7146.
A. Mahbubi, “Metode Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Konvensional dan Kontemporer (Analisis Komparatif),” J. alfazuna, vol. 9, no. Desember, pp. 107–132, 2024.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Akbar , Siti Nisaaul Akmaliya , Hilda Amanda Rahmalia , Luluk Asti Qomariah , Aumanda Nur Faiza Kholil

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.