Proceedings of The ICECRS
Vol 8 (2020): Educational and Psychological Conference in the 4.0 era
Articles

Factors That Cause Work Engagement in the Millennial Performance in BUMN
Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Work Engagement pada Angkatan Kerja Millennial di BUMN


HTML
  • Akhmad Fani Rakhim
Akhmad Fani Rakhim
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 19, 2020
Keywords
  • work-engaged,
  • millenial,
  • BUMN
How to Cite
Rakhim, A. F. (2020). Factors That Cause Work Engagement in the Millennial Performance in BUMN. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 8. Retrieved from https://icecrs.umsida.ac.id/index.php/icecrs/article/view/422

Copyright (c) 2020 Akhmad Fani Rakhim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Various research results reinforce the importance of having human resources engaged in their work. Employees who are engaged in their work will benefit both in terms of individuals, groups and organizations. In fact, the level of employee engagement in Indonesia is relatively low. Even the level of work engagement in the millennial workforce is at the lowest level. This study aims to determine the factors that influence the work engagement of millennial employees in BUMN. Participants consist of 3 BUMN's employees, male and have a working period of between 5 and 15 years. Data obtained through semi-structured interviews and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that work engagement in the millennial workforce is sourced from job resources and personal resources. Job resources include work environment, family atmosphere, career opportunities, rewards, valuable experiences and challenges; while personal resources include self efficacy. The millennial workforce also does job crafting by integrating their lives with their work.

HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1–9. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841
  2. Kimberley Breevaart, Arnold Bakker, Jørn Hetland, Evangelia Demerouti, Olav K. Olsen4 and Roar Espevik. 2014. Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. DOI : 10.1111/joop.12041.
  3. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. and Bakker, A.B. (2002), “The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 3.
  4. Lee, K. and Allen, N.J. (2002), “Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87
  5. Chughtai, Aamir Ali and Buckley, Finian. (2011). Work Engagement A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Career Development International. DOI : 10.1108/13620431111187290.
  6. Saks, Alan M. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Volume 21. DOI : 10.1108/02683940610690169
  7. Hewitt. (2008). Leadership Opportunities: Increased Bottom Line Results Through Improve Staff Engagement. Modul.
  8. Worldwide. 13% of employees are engaged at work. (Oktober, 2013). http://www.gallup.com/poll/165269/worldwide-employees-engaged-work.aspx.
  9. Global workforce study. (2014). https://www.towerswatson.com/en-BM/Insights/IC-Types/Survey-Research-Results/2014/08/the-2014-global-workforce-study.
  10. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Proyeksi penduduk indonesia 2010-2035. http: www.demografi.bps.go.id.
  11. Putra, Y. S. (2016). Theoritical review: Teori perbedaan generasi. Among Makarti, 9(18), 123- 134. doi:10.1016/amr.g67p123.
  12. Bakker, A.B., Albrecht, S.L., Leiter, M.P., 2011. Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.
  13. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W.B. (2001). The Jon Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(3): 499-512
  14. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., and Sanz-Vergel, A.I. 2014. Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD–R Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. DOI : 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235.
  15. Makakingas, Anne. Feldt, Taru. Kinnunen, Ulla. Mauno, Saija.,2013. Does personality matter ? a review of individual well-being. DOI : 10.1108/S2046-410X(2013)0000001008.
  16. Bakker, Arnold.2017. Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics. DOI : 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.002.
  17. Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J.E., 2001. Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review 26. L
  18. Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M.S. (2005), “Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review”, Journal of Management, Vol. 31.
  19. Robinson, D., Perryman, S. and Hayday, S. (2004), The Drivers of Employee Engagement, Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.