Vol 8 (2020): Educational and Psychological Conference in the 4.0 era
Articles

Analysis of Ethical Differences in Student Speaking of Educators in SDN Kedungturi and SD Al Islam Plus
Analisis Perbedaan Etika Berbicara Peserta Didik Terhadap Pendidik di SDN Kedungturi dan SD Al Islam Plus


Assa’Diah Eka Rahmawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Muhlasin Amrullah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published July 6, 2020
Keywords
  • Ethics of Speaking
How to Cite
Rahmawati, A. E., & Amrullah, M. (2020). Analysis of Ethical Differences in Student Speaking of Educators in SDN Kedungturi and SD Al Islam Plus. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 8. https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs2020461

Abstract

This study aims to describe the differences in speaking ethics of students in SD Al Islam and SDN Kedungturi and describe the causes of differences in the ethics of speaking students against teachers in SD Al Islam and SDN Kedungturi. This study used qualitative research methods. Where this research is researchers used to examine the condition of natural objects. In qualitative research researchers are very important because researchers are key instruments. In this study researchers used triangulation (combined) sources. Research instruments in the form of interviews and observations. Research instruments in the form of interviews and observations.  From the results of observations and interviews researchers can answer the problem formulation which is divided into 3 indicators, namely: (1) according to the teacher and from the interview results students are friendly and also polite both at school and outside of school, (2) students speak politely to the teacher, both at  inside and outside the classroom, (3) grade 3 students are difficult to talk to using standard language, they are more likely to use language that is easily understood by him. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded there are some differences between the two. But the difference is said to be not too significant. The reason for the existence of these differences is because both have different ways of delivering and applying learning to students. It is also because the environment between the two is very different.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bertnes K. 1993. Etika. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  2. Dahlan Syawir M. 2014. Etika Komunikasi dalam Al-Quran dan Hadis. Vol. 15 No. 1 Tahun 2014.
  3. Fuad Bin Abdil Aziz asy-Syalhub. 2007. Kumpulan Adab Islam. Jakarta: Griya Ilmu.
  4. Moleong J Lexy. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Posdakarya.
  5. Muhardisyah. 2017. Etika Dalam Komunikasi Islam. Banda Aceh: Vol. 1 No. 1 Tahun 2007.
  6. Sandhono Kandharu, dkk. 2014. Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia; Teori dan Aplikasi Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  7. Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  8. Tarigan Hendry Guntur. 2008. Berbicara Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa Bandung.
  9. Yazid. 2010. Adab & Akhlak Penuntut Ilmu. Bogor: Pustaka At Taqwa.